You don't drop a kid after his first year in the pros without a little something else being there. I agree he was a defensive liability in his own end and the main reason why he was traded but he has had attitude issues its well documented. Maybe his attitude issues are such that he wasn't willing to listen to the coaches. Something predicated the move more so then getting Libor, the Lightning needs right handed puck moving D in there system DeAngelo was the only one. So to me its probably him not wanting to listen to the coaches to try and correct his horrendous defensive zone coverage.
- stammerman
Those attitude issues stemmed from racial slurs and verbally abusing officials.
I'm not saying the kid didn't have warts to his game, obviously he does. All I'm saying is the Bolts didn't trade him b/c of his "attitude" when those attitude problems did not surface in his time with Cuse. There is no doubt he was struggling with the defensive side of the game, which IMO the Bolts expected somewhat when they drafted him. They probably figured if he became average in the d-zone his offense would more than make up for his defensive warts.
The Bolts were very high on Libor and the draft pick cost was too high to get #37. Their exact words bear this out that it "had" to be Deangelo to get the pick. Doesn't mean the Bolts didn't/don't think Deangelo won't be in the NHL, just means they felt Libor would be better or more rounded (again their words spell this out as well).
The fact they made this deal in spite of the need for RHD in the system should tell all of us how they feel about Libor
EDIT: They didn't "drop" Deangelo...they traded him. Which means they were very focused on acquiring Libor which means they really like Libor. Focus on the return and not what/who/why we gave up to get said return.